At the end of the day, the institution has to contend with the fact that smoking presents a great fire hazard (McKenzie and Smeltzer, 2001). This is inconsideration with the fact that the institution’s main and only industry is in oil production. Oil is a known flammable product; therefore by staff smoking within the workplace they increase the risks of a fire. Without a doubt, apart from oil, the institution also produces dangerous and flammable products like gasoline, kerosene, asphalt and event chemicals and other liquids (Rudnick, n.d.).
This institution cannot ignore the effects smoking has on the employees as well as productivity. Furthermore smoking decreases production since it is a distraction and annoyance in the workplace. This is taken into consideration since more than 50% of the employees smoke; therefore more that half of the staff takes frequent breaks to smoke. In terms of figures this represents about 30% of the workforce on a smoke break at any given time. Therefore with production down the institution is losing revenue while maintaining high employee costs. On the other hand these large numbers of smokers present a challenge to existing anti-tobacco policies. This is because there is added impetus in the control of smoking with the second hand smokers. Moreover smoking has been seen to cause morbidity within this institution.
These are just excerpts of essays please access the order form for custom essays, research papers, term papers, thesis, dissertations, book reports and case studies.